The Judicial Court became incomparably quiet; the vast majority of Jurors were dumbfounded, completely unable to imagine the case would develop this way.
This explanation sounds extremely far‑fetched at first, but on closer thought, given that the information about the "Lion King Card" has already been verified as true, this does indeed seem to be the only reasonable explanation.
Otherwise, what else could it be?
The man once had assets of over a hundred million? That sounds like pure nonsense.
The woman actually had assets of over a hundred million? That completely contradicts the evidence already in hand.
If we replace the "Chip Stacker" in this argument with the man, it might barely hold up, but up to now there's no evidence that the man ever worked as a Chip Stacker, and the probability of a man accompanying a female tycoon and being gifted such a card is far lower than that of a woman accompanying a male tycoon and being gifted such a card.
